Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
West Palm Beach Personal Injury Lawyer
Home > Blog > Airplane Accidents > Is Flying Safer Than Driving?

Is Flying Safer Than Driving?

The question is often asked, “Is flying safer than driving?

The question is often asked, “Is flying safer than driving?  In the media, it was said that Kobe Bryant could have drove two to three hours instead of flying and would be alive today.  But is driving truly safer?  There are statistics that provide an answer to this question.

If you consider the absolute numbers, one would arrive at the conclusion that driving is more dangerous than flying.  The International Air Transport Association reported that there was just one major aviation crash for every 5.4 million flights in 2018.  It is estimated that the odds of dying in a plane crash are 1 in 9,821.  For a better perspective, that is 1 fatal accident per 16 million flights.  Whereas the odds of dying in a car crash are approximately 1 in 114.

While these statistics seem convincing, several things must be considered.  First, most air travel making up these statistics falls under flights governed by 14 CFR Part 121.  These are commercial air carriers.  Commercial airlines are heavily regulated by federal law.  Most importantly, commercial airlines have strict standards for maintenance of aircraft, inspection, and pilot training.  Given these strict standards, you seldom hear of major airlines crashing.  Therefore, the majority of flights making up these flight safety statistics involve heavily regulated aircraft and flights.

What the air travel safety statistics do not highlight is that the majority of deaths that occur from aviation crashes result with aircraft that are governed by 14 CFR Part 91 (General Aviation), 14 CFR Part 125 (20 or more capacity aircraft) and 14 CFR Part 135 (commuter, air taxi, charter and on demand aircraft).  They rarely involve commercial aircraft that are governed by Part 121.  In fact, the cases you have heard about in the new lately, including Kobe Bryant’s crash and Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s crash, fell under Part 135 and Part 91 respectively.  Kobe Bryant’s was utilizing a charter operation aircraft under Part 135.  Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s was utilizing a privately owned aircraft that fell under Part 91.  In both cases, the flights were less regulated than commercial flights.

It is important to understand that charter aircraft and privately owned aircraft are not as heavily regulated as commercial aircraft.  As such, if you hire a charter operation for a flight or if you have a friend who uses his or her plane to fly you somewhere, the requirements for pilot training, pilot retraining, maintenance and inspection of the aircraft are far lower than when you fly commercial.  This may explain why most plane crashes are not commercial aircraft, even though commercial aircraft make up most of the flights yearly in the United States.

In conclusion, if you want to avoid the most risk when flying, fly commercial.  It is statistically safer than driving.  If you are okay with a bit more risk, take a charter.  For the most risk, take a flight on your friend’s private aircraft.  Unfortunately, despite your taste for risk, whether you use a motor vehicle or an aircraft, accidents will occur.  If you or a loved one has been involved in an aviation crash or motor vehicle crash, contact the attorneys at Lesser, Lesser, Landy & Smith, PLLC who have experience in handling these cases.

 

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission.

© 2019 - 2021 Lesser, Lesser, Landy & Smith, PLLC. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark Media.

×